From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754662AbXDZNiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:38:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754786AbXDZNiL (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:38:11 -0400 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:32940 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754662AbXDZNiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:38:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4630AA9E.9030807@bull.net> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:35:26 +0200 From: Pierre Peiffer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Jones , Ulrich Drepper , Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Ravikiran G Thirumalai , "Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" , pravin b shelar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russel Subject: Re: [PATCH, take6] FUTEX : new PRIVATE futexes References: <20060808070708.GA3931@localhost.localdomain> <200608090826.28249.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <200608090843.52893.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <200703152010.35614.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070405194942.1414c030.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070407104339.6674336b.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070411111913.6115dac8.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070426145521.0f8b6b35.dada1@cosmosbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20070426145521.0f8b6b35.dada1@cosmosbay.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ECN002/FR/BULL(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 26/04/2007 15:40:48, Serialize by Router on ECN002/FR/BULL(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 26/04/2007 15:40:54, Serialize complete at 26/04/2007 15:40:54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Dumazet a écrit : > Hi Andrew > > Not sure if you prefer to wait Pierre work on futex64, so just in case, I prepared this patch. > > Update on this take6 : > > - Rebased on linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2 , since futex64 were droped from mm > > > Pierre, I can resubmit another patch on top on your next patch, so please do as you prefer (ignoring or not this patch) Thank you for taking care of this. But I think your patch is more mature than the futex64 patch; So, it's ok for me, and it's probably simpler and better for "the community" (and for Andrew's work) to put this patch first, because futex64 still may need several reworks... -- Pierre