From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031352AbXDZREs (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:04:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031340AbXDZREs (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:04:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:56063 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754885AbXDZREh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:04:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4630DB24.4030005@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:02:28 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <20070426125802.GL3468@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> There is a conflict between Linus trying to release kernels every >> 2 months and releasing with few regressions. > > No. > > Regressions _increase_ with longer release cycles. They don't get fewer. > > The fact is, we have a -stable series for a reason. Problem is, not enough developers pay attention to the -stable series. Adrian, maybe you could shift your attention there and stop trying to track the bleeding edge?