From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1031462AbXDZTcJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1031462AbXDZTcJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031463AbXDZTcJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:09 -0400
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:60903 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1031462AbXDZTcH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4630FE35.7040206@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:05 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
References: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704252014050.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org> <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <4630E00B.3090502@tmr.com> <4630E9C8.5060000@garzik.org> <4630FA27.1090203@seclark.us>
In-Reply-To: <4630FA27.1090203@seclark.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 on srv5.dvmed.net summary:
	Content analysis details:   (-4.3 points, 5.0 required)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Stephen Clark wrote:
> If hardware worked in the previous version of the kernel can't users expect
> the same hardware to work in this kernel?

In general, yes.

	Jeff