From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755575AbXD0K0c (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:26:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755573AbXD0K0c (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:26:32 -0400 Received: from smtp102.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.212]:27778 "HELO smtp102.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755570AbXD0K0b (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:26:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v41NE5B+MO/PiZhAzHD2kseRqXuILrjOJMgRC8L9GRKs3h9+4wFpi/Q3GARlLIdtOBERNu/dQ2avNalAHsTAC4m2EceRiiKSOVNu+pgbS4ZGNmyDv49xTFGIOCVyj1RnPE0lSmD8qILzNJ6ujCklSHzNEVZSaFWAgS4GptnSxTk= ; X-YMail-OSG: pVKa9dYVM1no_zYAiuNEOFM1H5ocdZN.xK0Q1IKIYwHJwzMHgPAQmkvVCz8ZYNBdjWKyUs48mw-- Message-ID: <4631CFCD.7020207@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:26:21 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Jens Axboe , Christoph Lameter , Christoph Hellwig , David Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , William Lee Irwin III , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3 References: <20070426180358.GG2017@kernel.dk> <20070426180932.GA10642@infradead.org> <20070426181249.GH2017@kernel.dk> <20070426182945.GJ2017@kernel.dk> <20070426183935.GK2017@kernel.dk> <20070426194234.GL2017@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Jens Axboe writes: >>Yes, that is exactly the problem. Once you have that, pktcdvd is pretty >>much reduced to setup and init code, the actual data handling can be >>done by sr or ide-cd directly. You could merge it into cdrom.c, it would >>not be very different from mt-rainier handling (which basically does RMW >>in firmware, so it works for any write, but performance is of course >>horrible if you don't do it right). > > > Thanks for the clarification. > > So we do have a clear problem that we do not have generic support for > large sector sizes residing in the page cache. Well, it is a clear limitation. It hasn't mattered too much until now, but it is one of the other issues that SGI hit (aside from io efficiency) because they have 16K filesystems created on ia64 systems that I believe they want to access with x86-64 systems. I'm slowly looking at patches in the background, but I'm hoping to be able to spend a decent chunk of time working on them again soon. It isn't trivial :) -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.