From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756042AbXD0P4k (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756041AbXD0P4j (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:39 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:48951 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756040AbXD0P4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:38 -0400 Message-ID: <46321D2E.7000400@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:56:30 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael McConnell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date? References: <4631255F.9010902@eridani.co.uk> <4631873B.1000107@zytor.com> <200704271234.32679.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200704271234.32679.ak@suse.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: >> A lot of that code (although, of course, not all) could be written in C, >> though. I'm thinking of taking a stab at rewriting it that way. > > That would require a new compiler, right? I don't think that would > make users very happy. > > Besides the code is not exactly that maintenance intensive and only > changes rarely so I don't need a pressing need to rewrite it No, it would not need a new compiler. All it requires is gcc plus a reasonably recent binutils which you need anyway. -hpa