From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757162AbXD0Uzw (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:55:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757242AbXD0Uzw (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:55:52 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224]:22652 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757154AbXD0Uy6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:54:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M0lNcCwLv6aiv/PgeuvNWpKO0pFH6qWnak/XaNMPJ7Lf1pBvCkcDkMTFDe6yjmXU9b4JT8vHC/hZaRSNUSklduZ/CpeLRVlX4w77mM8YAbBKzcXnYjx4skgzgfj3hDQ0lWrfcIktLr0Ym+u5WaBVWfK1gG7WW5ZI8OeD0N/FvIs= Message-ID: <46326309.3050104@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:24:33 +0530 From: Manoj Joseph User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andreas Dilger , Marat Buharov , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , LKML , Jens Axboe , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation) References: <1177660767.6567.41.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070427013350.d0d7ac38.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <698310e10704270459t7663d39dp977cf055b8db9d2a@mail.gmail.com> <20070427193130.GD5967@schatzie.adilger.int> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Andreas Dilger wrote: >> It's true that this is a "feature" of ext3 with data=ordered (the default), >> but I suspect the same thing is now true in reiserfs too. > > Oh, well.. Journalling sucks. Go back to ext2? ;) > I was actually _really_ hoping that somebody would come along and tell > everybody that this whole journal-logging is stupid, and that it's just > better to not ever re-write blocks on disk, but instead write to new > blocks with version numbers (and not re-use old blocks until new versions > are stable on disk). Ah, "copy on write"! ZFS (Sun) and WAFL (NetApp) does this. Don't know about WAFL, but ZFS does logging too. -Manoj -- Manoj Joseph http://kerneljunkie.blogspot.com/