From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757314AbXD0VQv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:16:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757315AbXD0VQv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:16:51 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:48760 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757314AbXD0VQu (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:16:50 -0400 Message-ID: <46326861.2020603@tmr.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:17:21 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <20070426125802.GL3468@stusta.de> <20070426165950.GO3468@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070426165950.GO3468@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > Life has taught me that sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm wrong, and > sometimes both sides have a possible solution. We might agree to > disagree, and you are the one who's opinion counts. I can only say that > I am not happy with the result, and that I do therefore not spend my > time on maintaining regression lists for 2.6.22 - and maintaining such > lists is not something special noone else could do equally well. > And the next kernel will go out with no list to warn users, and no to-do list for -stable. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot