From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753732AbXD2RQR (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:16:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753729AbXD2RQQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:16:16 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:53633 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753507AbXD2RQP (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:16:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4634D2E6.5000307@goop.org> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:16:22 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: "Antonino A. Daplas" , Rusty Russell , patches@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] [37/48] i386: ignore vgacon if hardware not present References: <200704291252.514680000@suse.de> <200704291524.54080.ak@suse.de> <1177855838.17715.18.camel@daplas> <200704291616.58361.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200704291616.58361.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > I dropped the patch completely because you said it was already in mainline > or queued elsewhere. Was that wrong? > I think both patches are actually needed. The -mm message Antonio quoted probably refers to the fact that the patch is in your tree, so Andrew isn't carrying it separately. The patch called "ignore-vgacon-if-hardware-not-present" on firstfloor.org is what the name suggests. It appears to be still needed, because it still applies. The patch you've posted here with the subject "i386: ignore vgacon if hardware not present" is actually i386-eflags-header, but it appears to have a bad first line, which is why it is posted with the wrong subject. J