From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031398AbXD2UcS (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031410AbXD2UcS (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:18 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:60273 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031398AbXD2UcR (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:17 -0400 Message-ID: <463500CB.1010005@garzik.org> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:11 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Wang CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why ask Sun for ZFS while we have ReiserFS4 !? References: <660658.6960.qm@web73512.mail.tp2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <660658.6960.qm@web73512.mail.tp2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.1 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Wang wrote: > ZFS has some nice features, but ReiserFS4 also is a > good file system. > > Why do we want Sun to release ZFS under GPL, while > ReiserFS4 is already available under GPL!? Please take your content-free cheerleading to the local grade school football game. Jeff