public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
@ 2007-04-30 11:16 Jan Kiszka
  2007-04-30 11:23 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2007-04-30 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Andi Kleen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]

There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>

---
 include/asm-i386/i387.h |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/i387.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-i386/i387.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/i387.h
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( stru
 	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 }
 
-#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
-	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \
-		save_init_fpu( tsk ); 			\
-	else						\
-		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;			\
+#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do {				\
+	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {	\
+		__save_init_fpu(tsk);				\
+		stts();						\
+	} else							\
+		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;				\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __clear_fpu( tsk )					\


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
  2007-04-30 11:16 [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu Jan Kiszka
@ 2007-04-30 11:23 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-04-30 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Monday 30 April 2007 13:16:42 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
> none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
> Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Both patches added thanks
-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-30 11:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-30 11:16 [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu Jan Kiszka
2007-04-30 11:23 ` Andi Kleen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox