From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946876AbXD3W7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:59:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946880AbXD3W7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:59:08 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:57684 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946876AbXD3W7F (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:59:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z4b+iEvsPAwxznwhbh5G9ybfAO3Bm1+ayCY4OaBv6ngeKEKtxiDKSryf9hOJwuuYU48vCF7RsliEfD/EVjDPo2bHZFbl6dAm2BUfEDxqCWMk+YTsTUblpNZay2ESPlj9xym1W+uj4Sn6VD5JAT5QG7wgG0DfPAfF/K7L6zdT2io= Message-ID: <463674A9.9040100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 02:58:49 +0400 From: Manu Abraham User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trent Piepho CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing list , Michael Krufky , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linux DVB Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities References: <20070429182209.267430@gmx.net> <20070429205925.129920@gmx.net> <20070429230037.95120@gmx.net> <1177894713.3046.5.camel@p In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Trent Piepho wrote: > The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the dvb > helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this > anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly. With regards to the dst, i have explained earlier to you that 1) the dst is not a frontend 2) i do not wish to use the frontend attach methods with regards to dst/dst_ca To mention, we had these discussions much long back how to go about it and don't think that every time a new developer get's an account with linuxtv.org, this has to be a matter that has to discussed to death http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.dvb/16156/match=patch+dvb+bt8xx+cleanup (eventhough of not much concern) If you now see most of the code in dvb-bt8xx especially the DMA stuff was refactored from the dst driver. But that said, the dst *is* different, so WTH ?