From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@zoy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:34:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46375E04.5030506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070501130715.GB29131@zoy.org>
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> I'm having an issue with lost ticks, runnign linux 2.6.20.10 on an
> intel DQ965GF motherboard. For some reason this occurs with clock-like
> regularity, always exactly 24 lost ticks, about every two seconds.
> This is running with 250-HZ ticks, and the small pause every two seconds
> is also noticeable when using the console.
>
>
> running with report_lost_ticks, I see the following:
>
> May 1 12:58:57 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:58:59 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:01 server kernel: time.c: Lost 25 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:03 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:07 server last message repeated 2 times
> May 1 12:59:10 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:12 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:14 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:16 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:18 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip handle_IRQ_event+0x19/0x55)
> May 1 12:59:20 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:59:52 server last message repeated 15 times
> May 1 13:00:51 server last message repeated 28 times
> May 1 13:01:47 server last message repeated 27 times
> May 1 13:01:50 server kernel: time.c: Lost 25 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 13:01:56 server last message repeated 3 times
> May 1 13:01:58 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
>
>
> Since the rip often mentions _spin_unlock_irqrestore, I figured maybe
> someone sleeps for 25 ticks with the interrupts disabled. I tried
> running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP but this did not uncover anything.
>
>
> I also noticed this code in arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c. I'm not sure if it
> has anything to do with my issue, but it might since I get lost_count==24...
> I could not figure out what this code is trying to do though.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> /* In some cases the CPU can change frequency without us noticing
> Give cpufreq a change to catch up. */
> if ((lost_count+1) % 25 == 0)
> cpufreq_delayed_get();
> #endif
>
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here. Additional information about my system:
>
Try disabling CONFIG_CPU_FREQ?
> One last thing: I have another box which is fairly similar, with a
> DG965RY motherboard. That other box does *not* seem to lose any ticks,
> running the same kernel that works so poorly on the DQ965GF board.
> Does that point to a hardware/bios issue then ?????
Is it running the exact same kernel, with the same cpufreq settings at
runtime (governor, controller, etc?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 13:07 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-01 15:34 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2007-05-01 21:49 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-01 22:08 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-01 22:41 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-01 22:45 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-02 0:06 ` Lee Revell
2007-05-02 8:41 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-02 16:07 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-02 18:14 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-03 6:27 ` e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel) Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-03 15:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-03 15:56 ` Allan, Bruce W
2007-05-04 18:25 ` Kok, Auke
2007-05-04 21:15 ` Michel Lespinasse
2007-05-02 12:54 ` 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46375E04.5030506@redhat.com \
--to=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walken@zoy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).