From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423537AbXEATkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:40:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423558AbXEATkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:40:23 -0400 Received: from ext-nj2ut-5.online-age.net ([64.14.54.234]:36900 "EHLO ext-nj2ut-5.online-age.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423537AbXEATkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:40:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 834 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 15:40:22 EDT Message-ID: <4637945B.F4D7417@ae.ge.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 15:26:19 -0400 From: "Wagner, Chris (GEAE, CBTS)" Organization: GE Aircraft Engines \Cincinnati Bell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinctmodule References: <524f69650704301552j13cd46e5y53a233af753e0548@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2007 19:26:20.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[98FCF8F0:01C78C26] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Then we can just rename the project CI. :) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > And, what also puzzles me... almost every filesystem that's not at revision 1 > anymore (ext2/3/4, reiser4, smb2) does not have the usually omnipresent "fs" > suffix anymore (cf. reiserfs, smbfs). Maybe it's time to drop all the "fs" > suffixes? :) -- Chris Wagner CBTS GE Aircraft Engines Chris.Wagner@ae.ge.com