public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Carter <coffeedude.jerry@gmail.com>
To: simo <idra@samba.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
	linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a	distinct module
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 09:46:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4639F5AD.20807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178203013.28758.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simo,

> I guess DFS referrals can work cross protocol, so if you are redirected
> from a longhorn server to a windoes 2000 or a samba server you want to
> be able to follow the DFS referral and not return an error.
> To do that you need to have either 1 module that support both protocols
> or a way from one module to call the other. Just separating the 2
> without any glue will not work (or you will have to add some userspace
> upcall hack to make it work).

Long term I agree that CIFS and SMB2 should be in the same .ko
But NTLM 0.12 still works for Vista and DFS referrals.
Breaking out SMB2 initially means that it will not clutter
the working cifs.ko code.  Remember that an SMB2 client fs is
mostly research at this point, and not engineering.



cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGOfWsIR7qMdg1EfYRAk35AJ9bCG/s2rIn2HVB4XehxBMY8XH1AQCgkQUj
Jy522rF0YIdICgd70IWKj4s=
=EWTL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-03 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30 22:52 SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module Steve French
2007-04-30 23:15 ` Chris Friesen
2007-05-01  9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-03 13:21   ` [linux-cifs-client] " simo
2007-05-03 14:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-03 14:36       ` simo
2007-05-03 14:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-03 14:53           ` simo
2007-05-03 15:14           ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-03 14:46         ` Gerald Carter [this message]
2007-05-03 14:56           ` simo
2007-05-03 15:35             ` Steve French
2007-05-03 15:44               ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-04 17:12           ` Jeremy Allison
2007-05-04 17:43             ` simo
2007-05-05  9:55               ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-04 18:35             ` Steve French
2007-05-01  9:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-01 19:26   ` [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinctmodule Wagner, Chris (GEAE, CBTS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4639F5AD.20807@gmail.com \
    --to=coffeedude.jerry@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=idra@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox