public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davi Arnaut <davi@haxent.com.br>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfc: threaded epoll_wait thundering herd
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 18:42:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463CFA37.3020809@haxent.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705051155210.19104@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> If multiple threads are parked on epoll_wait (on a single epoll fd) and
>> events become available, epoll performs a wake up of all threads of the
>> poll wait list, causing a thundering herd of processes trying to grab
>> the eventpoll lock.
>>
>> This patch addresses this by using exclusive waiters (wake one). Once
>> the exclusive thread finishes transferring it's events, a new thread
>> is woken if there are more events available.
>>
>> Makes sense?
> 
> Theorically, make sense. I said theorically because all the use 
> epoll_wait MT use cases I've heard of, use a single thread that does the 
> epoll_wait, and then dispatch to worker threads. So thundering herd is not 
> in the picture. OTOH, it does not hurt either.

A google search turns up a few users. It also addresses some complaints
from Drepper.

> But, that code is completely changed with the new single-pass epoll delivery 
> code that is in -mm. So, I'd either wait for that code to go in, or I 
> (or you, if you like) can make a patch against -mm.

Fell free to update the patch for -mm and to include my signed-of-by.
Thanks.

--
Davi Arnaut


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-05 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070504225730.490334000@haxent.com.br>
2007-05-04 23:37 ` [PATCH] rfc: threaded epoll_wait thundering herd Davi Arnaut
2007-05-05  4:15   ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05  4:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-05  5:47       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-05 19:00   ` Davide Libenzi
2007-05-05 21:42     ` Davi Arnaut [this message]
2007-05-07 21:00       ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07 21:34         ` Davi Arnaut
2007-05-07 22:19           ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07 22:35             ` Davide Libenzi
2007-05-08  2:49               ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-08  3:56                 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-05-08  4:35                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-08  6:30                 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-05-07 23:15             ` Davi Arnaut
2007-05-08  2:32               ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-08  3:24                 ` Davi Arnaut
2007-05-07 22:47         ` Davide Libenzi
2007-05-07 15:46     ` Chase Venters
2007-05-07 17:18       ` Davide Libenzi
2007-05-07 18:17         ` Chase Venters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463CFA37.3020809@haxent.com.br \
    --to=davi@haxent.com.br \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox