Re: [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>> It's trivial to merge the MADV_FREE #defines into the kernel
>> though, and aliasing MADV_FREE to MADV_DONTNEED for the time
>> being is a one-liner - just an extra constant into the big
>> switch statement in sys_madvise().
> 
> Until the semantics of the implementation is cut into stone by having it 
> in the kernel I'll not start using it.

The current MADV_DONTNEED implementation conforms to the
semantics of MADV_FREE :)

With MADV_FREE you can get back either your old data, or
a freshly zeroed out new page.  Always getting back the
second alternative is conformant :)

-- 
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.