From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CodingStyle: start flamewar about use of braces
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 18:50:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4640FEA0.3020407@seclark.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070508222540.GG8753@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:19:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>>>>+Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
>>>>+
>>>>+if (condition)
>>>>+ action();
>>>>+
>>>>+This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single
>>>>+statement. Use braces in both branches.
>>>>+
>>>>+if (condition) {
>>>>+ do_this();
>>>>+ do_that();
>>>>+} else {
>>>>+ otherwise();
>>>>+}
>>>>
>>>>
>>If anyone tries to add braces to my code's 'else' statements where they
>>are not required, that patch will get NAK'd in a heartbeat.
>>
>>
>
>Oh isn't coding style fun. I personally hate code that doesn't ALWAYS
>have the braces everywhere since it makes adding a print statement
>or other debuging to the condition such a pain since you then have to
>add braces to the condition to avoid breaking the code just to insert
>a print statement. It is one of the few things I disagree with in the
>linux kernel coding style.
>
>--
>Len Sorensen
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
I agree - it is merely defensive programming to always have the braces,
it prevents someone
from sticking in a diag and forgetting to add braces so things go haywire.
My $.02
Steve
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200705081903.l48J3AOw010373@hera.kernel.org>
2007-05-08 19:43 ` CodingStyle: start flamewar about use of braces Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 22:25 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-05-08 22:50 ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2007-05-08 23:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 23:37 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-09 8:16 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-09 8:59 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4640FEA0.3020407@seclark.us \
--to=stephen.clark@seclark.us \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox