public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem?
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:09:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4642389E.4080804@goop.org> (raw)

I've had a couple of instances of a linux-2.6 mercurial repo getting
corrupted in some odd way this morning.  It looks like files are being
truncated; not to size 0, but losing something off the end.

This is on an xfs filesystem.  I haven't had any crashes/oops, and I
don't think its the normal files getting filled with 0 problem.  I saw
this before the most recent set of xfs updates, but it happened again
afterwards too.

Mercurial uses a strictly append-only model for updating its repo files,
but it looks like maybe an append operation didn't stick.

I'm repulling a fresh copy of the repo; I'll be able to compare
before/after.  Update: yep, definitely truncated:

$ ls -l .hg-new/store/data/_documentation/pi-futex.txt.i .hg-broken/store/data/_documentation/pi-futex.txt.i
4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jeremy jeremy 3309 May  9 09:43 .hg-broken/store/data/_documentation/pi-futex.txt.i
4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jeremy jeremy 3797 May  9 13:38 .hg-new/store/data/_documentation/pi-futex.txt.i

also
  3476 -rw-rw-r--  1 jeremy jeremy   3558208 May  9 13:55 00manifest.i
  3476 -rw-rw-r--  1 jeremy jeremy   3555200 May  9 09:41 00manifest.i~


where 00manifest.i~ is the broken one. The files are identical up to the
truncation point.

The repo passed "hg verify" just after I pulled it, so this corruption
came about after a while.

Hm, the other possibility is that nlinks is being misreported.  When
cloning a repo, mercurial will generally hard-link files where possible,
and then break the link if it sees nlink > 1.  If xfs is mis-reporting
the link count, then this will cause havok.  Is that possible?  Seems
unlikely, but it would also explain the symptoms.  I just did a linking
clone with an older kernel, and the link count is as expected.

xfs_check passes without any output, which I presume is good.

    J

             reply	other threads:[~2007-05-09 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-09 21:09 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-05-09 21:55 ` 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem? Matt Mackall
2007-05-09 22:17   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-09 22:44     ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-09 22:50       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-09 23:16 ` David Chinner
2007-05-09 23:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10  0:01     ` David Chinner
2007-05-10  0:04       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10  0:49         ` David Chinner
2007-05-10  0:54           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10  1:26             ` David Chinner
     [not found]               ` <46433049.4020003@goop.org>
2007-05-10 15:38                 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-12 11:21                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-12 12:46                     ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 20:16                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 20:27                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 21:13                 ` David Chinner
2007-05-10 21:23                   ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-10 21:32                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 21:49                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 21:41         ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-10 21:46           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 21:51             ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-10 21:54               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 22:58                 ` David Chinner
2007-05-10 23:07                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 23:27                     ` David Chinner
2007-05-10 23:49                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-11  0:32                         ` David Chinner
2007-05-11 14:48                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-12  7:56                             ` David Chinner
2007-05-12 11:23                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-12 13:51                   ` David Chinner
2007-05-12 14:56                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-15  0:14                       ` David Chinner
2007-05-15 19:24                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 23:07               ` David Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4642389E.4080804@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox