Re: [PATCH 4/6] firewire: OHCI-1394 lowlevel driver

["Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +	if (pci_enable_device(dev)) {
>> +		fw_error("Failed to enable OHCI hardware.\n");
>> +		return cleanup(ohci, CLEANUP_PUT_CARD, -ENODEV);
> 
> Please use normal goto unwinding so the driver follows the same model
> as almost all other pci drivers and allows people to follow your driver
> more easily.  Also it's not a alot of cleanup code, so removing this
> might actually be a net decrease in lines of code.

Sure.  The patch I have here says 42 insertions, 44 deletions :)

>> +	if (software_reset(ohci)) {
> 
> Please give all your function a nice prefix so that oops messages are
> more readable.

I don't see a strong precedence for this for static functions.  For example, 
if you grep for 'static' in drivers/usb/core, there's a mix of usb_* prefixed 
functions and functions without a consistent prefix.  Plus, when the drivers 
are loaded as modules, the module name will be in the stack trace.  I can 
track down the most generic sounding functions and give them a fw_ prefix, but 
doing a whole-sale prefixing of static functions will make the source more 
noisy and reduce readabilty - I'm not sure it's worth it.

cheers,
Kristian