From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760131AbXEJJwO (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 05:52:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755898AbXEJJwA (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 05:52:00 -0400 Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:57410 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754720AbXEJJv7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 05:51:59 -0400 Message-Id: <46430780.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:52:32 +0200 From: "Jan Beulich" To: , Subject: pte_{ex,rd}protect Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Various architectures define these, but they aren't being used anywhere - candidates for removal? The more that (at least) on i386 and x86-64 pte_exprotect() is not symmetrical to pte_exec() and pte_mkexec()... Jan