public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPar>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:48:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4643A128.30302@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070510220406.GA21110@mailshack.com>

Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:08:10AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> As far as I could tell, "scan" simply caused the nonstandard video
>> driver scan modules (unsafe probes) to be invoked.  Since those modules
>> are no longer present, there appeared to be no need for them.  The VGA
>> and VESA probes are safe.
> 
> It doesn't probe the hardware in dangerous ways. (Search for mode_scan
> in video.S) It works by trying to set a mode via the normal
> AH=0/AL=mode/int 0x10 method for all possible values of mode. It then
> checks if the bios reports the new mode as being set and reads a few
> standard vga registers to determine if it is a text mode. It's
> completely independent of the CONFIG_VIDEO_SVGA stuff.

It's dangerous, all right (which is why it doesn't do it by default),
since you have no guarantee that the BIOS doesn't totally vomit on these
calls -- or, like my laptop, take about a minute before giving up
finding nothing.

Anyway, I re-implemented scanning and pushed it out to the git tree;
please try it out as it does absolutely nothing on any of my machines.

> That makes me wonder: (from arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S)
> 
> 37         movw    $__BOOT_DS, %cx
> 38 
> 39         movl    %cr0, %edx
> 40         orb     $1, %dl                 # Protected mode (PE) bit
> 41         movl    %edx, %cr0
> 42
> 43         movw    %cx, %ds
> 44         movw    %cx, %es
> 45         movw    %cx, %fs
> 46         movw    %cx, %gs
> 47         movw    %cx, %ss
> 48
> 49         # Jump to the 32-bit entrypoint
> 50         .byte   0x66, 0xea              # ljmpl opcode
> 51 2:      .long   0                       # offset
> 52         .word   __BOOT_CS               # segment
> 
> I thought the 32-bit jump was required to come before the segment loads.
> Does this code load values from the gdt, or are they just loaded as real
> mode segments? As long as it does not crash it does not matter, because
> head.S reloads them again.

Once CR0.PE is set, segments are loaded from the GDT.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-09  5:15 x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09  6:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-09  7:02   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09  8:11     ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-10 14:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 18:08   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 18:38     ` Martin Mares
2007-05-11  0:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 22:04     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 22:48       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-05-12 12:21         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-12 14:20           ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:09             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 18:35               ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:59                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 22:04                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 22:08                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-11  4:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-11 23:58 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-12  0:23   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-13  0:35     ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-15 20:45     ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4643A128.30302@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPar \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox