From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762009AbXEKRzD (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 13:55:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758572AbXEKRyz (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 13:54:55 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:59066 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757925AbXEKRyy (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 13:54:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4644AE05.5080308@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:55:17 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: clameter@sgi.com CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors References: <20070511165749.026947116@sgi.com> <20070511165946.145806097@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20070511165946.145806097@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org clameter@sgi.com wrote: > There is no user of destructors left. There is no reason why we should > keep checking for destructors calls in the slab allocators. Looks good to me. Acked-by: Pekka Enberg