From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPar>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:08:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46463AED.5060800@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1iraxr95g.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ok. If you have tested on a wide variety of machines then I won't
> worry about it.
>
> I guess if a cr0 write has always been synchronizing things should be
> a safe practice. The practical danger is if you write to cr0 and the
> pipeline is not flushed and the segment loads might execute as 16bit
> mode segment register loads. I think this is more of a 486 or 586/Pentium
> danger actually then a 386 one.
Writes to CR0 are synchronizing and are documented as such. This is a
fairly trivial consequence of it invoking microcode on every x86 ever
created.
> Hmm. I'm not certain about enabling protected mode but enabling paging
> at least does appear to be documented to require a jump, before the P6
> core. Which may be why it is recommended for initializing protected
> mode.
Enabling paging is possibly a different matter. I can't speak on that
particular subject with any authority.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-09 5:15 x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 6:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-09 7:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 8:11 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-10 14:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 18:38 ` Martin Mares
2007-05-11 0:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 22:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 22:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 12:21 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-12 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 22:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 22:08 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-05-11 4:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-11 23:58 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-12 0:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-13 0:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-15 20:45 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46463AED.5060800@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPar \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox