From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
discuss@x86-64.org, trivial@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 04:14:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4646C8FA.2090602@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3abw9a4w9.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
>>> - /* Reenable any watchpoints before delivering the
>>> + /* Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the
>
> Andi> reenable gets >140k google hits so it seems to be an really
> Andi> used word.
Well you will find extensive "misuse" of all the re-e* words in
english, but all should be hyphenated. Moreover, there is no
license in english to just create new such words, you cannot
re-entertain your guests for example. In practice we do allow
creation of new re-e* words, as in re-execute, and that's
probably ok in techno-jargon-speak.
But re-enable is an old and well used word, reenable is not,
and I see no reason to encourage the latter incorrect use,
since it is harder to read (double e after r at the start
of the word is almost always a long e).
Note that in google, you always want to hyphenate. reenable
will catch only the misuses, re-enable will catch both.
>
> Essentially all commonly used English words which start out with hyphens
> loose them over time. It starts out with typos and progresses until the
> non-hyphenated form becomes the exclusively used form. It does seem that
> re-enable → reenable is occurring, based on those search hits.
Hyphens do sometimes disappear, but not for re-e*, OED version
2 does not allow a single such instance.
>
> Andi> Similar with upto.
>
> I’ve a *much* harder time agreeing with «upto» in place of «up to».
> That should be treated as a typo in need of fixing.
Indeed .. upto is not a word.
>
> -JimC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-13 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 19:44 [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/ Simon Arlott
2007-05-12 16:25 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2007-05-13 1:27 ` James Cloos
2007-05-13 8:14 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2007-05-13 13:47 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-14 0:36 ` James Cloos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4646C8FA.2090602@adacore.com \
--to=dewar@adacore.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox