From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:10:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46489818.4000408@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179158912.3703.47.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> Subject: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
>
> This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately.
> This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
>
> Rediffed to work in the absence of the smp consolidation patch
>
I think Andrew is carrying that in -mm. If you're proposing this for
git, then we may as well pull in that patch too.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 16:08 [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-05-14 17:22 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 19:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 22:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 22:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46489818.4000408@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox