Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

Andrew Morton
2007-05-14T20:00:17Z

On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:10:48 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> James Bottomley wrote:
> > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> > Subject: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
> >
> > This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately.
> > This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> >
> > Rediffed to work in the absence of the smp consolidation patch
> >
>
> I think Andrew is carrying that in -mm. If you're proposing this for
> git, then we may as well pull in that patch too.
>

Does "that" have name? I can find no patch in -mm which appears to have
anything to do with SMP consolidation, and this patch applies cleanly to
the current -mm lineup.