From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
caglar@pardus.org.tr, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v12
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:04:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464A6698.3080400@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070513153853.GA19846@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm pleased to announce release -v12 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> The CFS patch against v2.6.22-rc1, v2.6.21.1 or v2.6.20.10 can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
>
> -v12 fixes the '3D bug' that caused trivial latencies in 3D games: it
> turns out that the problem was not resulting out of any core quality of
> CFS, it was caused by 3D userspace growing dependent on the current
> inefficiency of the vanilla scheduler's sys_sched_yield()
> implementation, and CFS's "make yield work well" changes broke it.
>
> Even a simple 3D app like glxgears does a sys_sched_yield() for every
> frame it generates (!) on certain 3D cards, which in essence punishes
> any scheduler that implements sys_sched_yield() in a sane manner. This
> interaction of CFS's yield implementation with this user-space bug could
> be the main reason why some testers reported SD to be handling 3D games
> better than CFS. (SD uses a yield implementation similar to the vanilla
> scheduler.)
>
> So i've added a yield workaround to -v12, which makes it work similar to
> how the vanilla scheduler and SD does it. (Xorg has been notified and
> this bug should be fixed there too. This took some time to debug because
> the 3D driver i'm using for testing does not use sys_sched_yield().) The
> workaround is activated by default so -v12 should work 'out of the box'.
>
> Mike Galbraith has fixed a bug related to nice levels - the fix should
> make negative nice levels more potent again.
>
> Changes since -v10:
>
> - nice level calculation fixes (Mike Galbraith)
>
> - load-balancing improvements (this should fix the SMP performance
> problem reported by Michael Gerdau)
>
> - remove the sched_sleep_history_max tunable.
>
> - more debugging fields.
>
> - various cleanups, fixlets and code reorganization
>
> As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
> than welcome,
Load balancing appears to be badly broken in this version. When I
started 4 hard spinners on my 2 CPU machine one ended up on one CPU and
the other 3 on the other CPU and they stayed there.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-16 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-13 15:38 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v12 Ingo Molnar
2007-05-16 2:04 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2007-05-16 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-16 23:42 ` Peter Williams
[not found] ` <20070516063625.GA9058@elte.hu>
2007-05-17 23:45 ` Peter Williams
[not found] ` <20070518071325.GB28702@elte.hu>
2007-05-18 13:11 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-18 13:26 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-19 13:27 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-05-20 1:41 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-21 8:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-21 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 12:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-22 16:48 ` Chris Friesen
2007-05-22 20:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-22 20:49 ` Chris Friesen
2007-05-21 15:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-05-21 23:51 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-22 4:47 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-22 12:03 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-24 7:43 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-24 16:45 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-24 23:23 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-29 20:45 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-29 23:54 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-30 0:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-30 2:18 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-30 4:42 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-30 6:28 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-31 1:49 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-22 11:52 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-05-23 0:10 ` Peter Williams
2007-05-18 0:18 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-18 1:01 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-18 4:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-18 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464A6698.3080400@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox