From: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
To: Christian Volkmann <haveaniceday@cv-sv.de>
Cc: Claas Langbehn <claas@rootdir.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Via C3/C7: other flags possible ?
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 23:52:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464F7F90.2000900@simon.arlott.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464F7C09.8060809@cv-sv.de>
On 19/05/07 23:36, Christian Volkmann wrote:
> Christian Volkmann wrote:
>> Claas asked for the NX flag for the Via C3 (?) processors
>> in another thread.
If you read the other thread properly you'd see that the BIOS has
an option to enable or disable it... when enabled it shows up.
>> I do not know another synonym for this?
>>
>> Claas Langbehn wrote:
>>> Hello Christian,
>>>
>>> do you know if and how it's possible to enable NX_bit too?
>
> C7 Esther:
> Hmm, I expect the NX-Bit should be detected from linux during the
> boot. The NX function bit seems to be at the same place where it's
> located for other CPU.
> Unfortunately I have no C7 hardware and I am too much a beginner
> in kernel programming to prepare this "dry".
>
> May be a "senior kernel programmer" can easy check if the C7 runs
> through the regular NX-function detection?
NX is detected ok on the C7:
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : VIA Esther processor 1500MHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size : 128 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce apic sep mtrr pge cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 tm nx pni est tm2 rng rng_en ace ace_en ace2 ace2_en phe phe_en pmm pmm_en
bogomips : 1601.18
clflush size : 64
I can't reboot that box just to test cx8 detection (which is missing).
--
Simon Arlott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-19 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-17 0:09 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Christian
2007-05-17 0:42 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 1:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 1:39 ` Christian
2007-05-17 21:28 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-17 21:47 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 21:59 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-31 5:22 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: remove support for the Rise CPU Adrian Bunk
2007-05-31 13:31 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-31 17:37 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-31 17:48 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19 10:22 ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Hans de Bruin
2007-05-17 8:56 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-17 11:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-17 15:02 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19 5:53 ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 6:02 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19 11:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 17:23 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19 8:22 ` Claas Langbehn
2007-05-19 18:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19 11:42 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-23 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19 17:26 ` Claas Langbehn
2007-05-19 20:22 ` Via C3: other flags possible ? Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 22:36 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 22:52 ` Simon Arlott [this message]
2007-05-20 8:19 ` Via C3/C7: " Claas Langbehn
2007-05-20 13:14 ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-20 12:59 ` Via C3: " Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 17:54 ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II Claas Langbehn
2007-05-17 1:10 ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17 1:25 ` Christian
2007-05-17 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17 3:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 3:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17 4:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 6:18 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 6:17 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 9:22 ` Hans de Bruin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464F7F90.2000900@simon.arlott.org.uk \
--to=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=claas@rootdir.de \
--cc=haveaniceday@cv-sv.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).