From: "Huang, Honglei" <honghuan@amd.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ray.Huang@amd.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
leonro@nvidia.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: free the entire IOVA reservation in dma_iova_destroy()
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 11:31:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464bbc14-78b3-4863-9cff-b2613fa56267@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <820112f0-4361-496f-ba84-557746c75601@arm.com>
On 7/1/2026 8:36 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 01/07/2026 10:20 am, Honglei Huang wrote:
>> dma_iova_try_alloc() reserves IOVA for the whole requested size and
>> records it in state->__size, but callers may subsequently link only a
>> part of that reservation, for example the drm_gpusvm mixed range case,
>> where a device page range is linked incrementally.
>>
>> The doc for dma_iova_destroy() is:
>>
>> "Unlink the IOVA range up to @mapped_len and free the entire IOVA
>> space."
>>
>> However __iommu_dma_iova_unlink() computed the amount of IOVA to free
>> from @mapped_len rather than from the full reservation. When the
>> reservation is larger than the linked length, the tail
>> [mapped_len, reserved size] is never returned to the allocator and
>> is leaked, contrary to the documented contract.
>
> That's not what really happens in practice though - note that
> free_iova() doesn't even take a size, only a pfn with which to look up
> the corresponding rbtree entry. At worst, for sizes small enough for the
> rcaches, a larger IOVA may be put in a cache for a smaller size, which
> although wasteful, is otherwise pretty much benign.
>
> This isn't to say that the allocator behaviour might not eventually
> change in future, but for now I can only assume that dma_iova_destroy()
> doing this is intentional, because I pointed it out at least 3 times
> over the course of the original review from RFC to eventual merge, and
> Leon made a point of refusing to do anything about it :/
>
Got it, I checked the code, the current code behavior does not cause a
leak. Leon proposed a new modification, will send V2.
And I believe is a cleanup rather than a fix.
Regards,
Honglei
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>> Free the whole reservation using dma_iova_size(), mirroring
>> dma_iova_free(). The unmap step still operates on @mapped_len only, and
>> the same iotlb_gather is reused so a single IOTLB flush is performed.
>>
>> Fixes: 433a76207dcf ("dma-mapping: Implement link/unlink ranges API")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> index 9abaec0703e..bb29c82d1c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> @@ -2096,8 +2096,11 @@ static void __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(struct
>> device *dev,
>> if (!iotlb_gather.queued)
>> iommu_iotlb_sync(domain, &iotlb_gather);
>> - if (free_iova)
>> + if (free_iova) {
>> + /* Free the whole reservation, not just the linked @size. */
>> + size = iova_align(iovad, dma_iova_size(state) + iova_start_pad);
>> iommu_dma_free_iova(domain, addr, size, &iotlb_gather);
>> + }
>> }
>> /**
>>
>> base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 9:20 [PATCH] iommu/dma: free the entire IOVA reservation in dma_iova_destroy() Honglei Huang
2026-07-01 12:36 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-01 19:08 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-03 3:31 ` Huang, Honglei [this message]
2026-07-01 19:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-02 10:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-03 3:37 ` Huang, Honglei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464bbc14-78b3-4863-9cff-b2613fa56267@amd.com \
--to=honghuan@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox