linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Volkmann <haveaniceday@cv-sv.de>
To: Claas Langbehn <claas@rootdir.de>
Cc: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Via C3/C7: other flags possible ?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:14:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <465049BE.5000000@cv-sv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4650047F.4000804@rootdir.de>

Bit 20 in edx is set if NX is available for C7:

eax in: 0x80000001, eax = 00000000 ebx = 00000000 ecx = 00000000 edx = 00100000
( from your posting "This kernel requires the following..." )

The official VIA Eden  datasheet seems to be NDA. I have not found any
official download link on the pages:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/c7/
The /c3/ pages contain the documentation  for the C3 family.

I do not think the NX feature can be switched on/off by regular registers.

May be it helps to play around with the bios ?
Load "default settings" => see how the NX flag acts.
Load "optimized settings" => see how the NX flags acts.

I suppose the bios developer had used one setting to test and
work with the NX flag regular.

Christian


> If you read the other thread properly you'd see that the BIOS has an option to enable or disable it... when enabled it shows up.
PS: @Simon, sorry that I missed the other thread. Too much traffic
and not enough time for me to read all. I suppose that's a fulltime job ;-)

Claas Langbehn wrote:
> Simon Arlott schrieb:
>> On 19/05/07 23:36, Christian Volkmann wrote:
>>> Christian Volkmann wrote:
>>>> Claas asked for the NX flag for the Via C3 (?) processors
>>>> in another thread.
>>
>> If you read the other thread properly you'd see that the BIOS has an
>> option to enable or disable it... when enabled it shows up.
> 
> Right, but my bios disables this after each boot-time :(
> Therefore it would be great if the kernel would not care
> about the BIOS and enable it anyway.
> 
> This seems to be a severe bug in the BIOS, but VIA does not
> deliver a new BIOS since months. :(
> 
>>
>> I can't reboot that box just to test cx8 detection (which is missing).
>>
> It works here.
> 
> 
> 
> claas
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-20 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-17  0:09 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Christian
2007-05-17  0:42 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17  1:15   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17  1:55     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17  1:39   ` Christian
2007-05-17 21:28     ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-17 21:47       ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 21:59         ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-31  5:22         ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: remove support for the Rise CPU Adrian Bunk
2007-05-31 13:31           ` Dave Jones
2007-05-31 17:37             ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-31 17:48               ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19 10:22       ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Hans de Bruin
2007-05-17  8:56   ` Alan Cox
2007-05-17 11:51   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-17 15:02     ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:14     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19  5:53   ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II Andi Kleen
2007-05-19  6:02     ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19 11:47       ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 17:23         ` Dave Jones
2007-05-19  8:22     ` Claas Langbehn
2007-05-19 18:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19 11:42     ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 11:54       ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-23 21:50         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-19 17:26       ` Claas Langbehn
2007-05-19 20:22         ` Via C3: other flags possible ? Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 22:36           ` Christian Volkmann
2007-05-19 22:52             ` Via C3/C7: " Simon Arlott
2007-05-20  8:19               ` Claas Langbehn
2007-05-20 13:14                 ` Christian Volkmann [this message]
2007-05-20 12:59             ` Via C3: " Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 17:54       ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II Claas Langbehn
2007-05-17  1:10 ` 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17  1:25   ` Christian
2007-05-17  2:21     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17  3:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17  3:16         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17  4:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17  6:18             ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17  6:31               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17  6:17           ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17  9:22 ` Hans de Bruin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=465049BE.5000000@cv-sv.de \
    --to=haveaniceday@cv-sv.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=claas@rootdir.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).