linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sd_resume redundant?  [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()]
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4650891F.80301@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.jSmqI/kJPff3zaVtC404yNL5/Qk@ifi.uio.no>

Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>> Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?
>> Because not all disks spin up without being told to do so and like it or
>> not spinning disks up on resume is the default behavior.  As I wrote in
>> the other reply, it would be worthwhile to make it configurable.
> 
> Not even after they receive a read command? Ugh.

ATA disks are supposed to spin up, yes. SCSI disks require a command to 
tell them to spin up if they're in the "stopped" state.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


       reply	other threads:[~2007-05-20 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.M0o+I253i7tt/LF97sml0AM+Gec@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.j/gDhS9FZwWkX/stLhREkTHNbFs@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.EalQUMJMBHX/KTGV2QFQLG6tYus@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.Zh3ttZJ9A5tObhEjMLSALUpxCuQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.tQ9LHpM0TOYAYEug36HHMvEVOO0@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.jSmqI/kJPff3zaVtC404yNL5/Qk@ifi.uio.no>
2007-05-20 17:45           ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-05-20 18:53             ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Randy Dunlap
2007-05-20 22:25               ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-10  7:20 libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 11:53   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 12:46     ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 13:08       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <20070511005217.GA23186@li <464B3505.20004@gmail.com>
2007-05-19 16:39           ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:43             ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 19:04               ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:33                 ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20  9:54                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 14:27                     ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:17                       ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:47                         ` Indan Zupancic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4650891F.80301@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).