From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763734AbXEVPHF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 11:07:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756289AbXEVPGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 11:06:55 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:47734 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756197AbXEVPGy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 11:06:54 -0400 Message-ID: <46530708.3040402@goop.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:06:48 +0100 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml , Xen-devel Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] xen: Xen paravirt_ops implementation References: <20070522140941.802382212@goop.org> <200705221657.53607.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200705221657.53607.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: >> This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The >> series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked >> in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. >> > > I already got it in my tree now from your previous post. Does this > version have changes over that one? Yes, I've done a few passes of tidying up, and spent some effort on beefing up the patch descriptions/changelogs. There are no significant functional differences though. J