public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:09:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4654AD91.1030808@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705231403.24439.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Apparently Vista will move away from using type 1 config space accesses 
> though, so if we keep using it, we'll probably run into some lame board 

Yep.


> that assumes you're using mmconfig at some point in the near future.  
> But then again, we're often on that less tested path (e.g. with ACPI), 
> so maybe that doesn't matter much.

One of the reasons why hardware vendors want to move away from 
traditional accesses is to be able to use the larger config space in 
PCI-Express, rather than being locked into the 256-byte legacy PCI 
config space.

Several modern PCI-Express devices utilize the upper config space, but 
due to legacy reasons the registers are usually ones that do not require 
OS drivers to know about (like BIST stuff or diagnostic registers).

Expect that to change, as MS shakes out the bugs (or maybe we are doing 
their job for them?).

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-23 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30  2:14 [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources Robert Hancock
2007-04-30  2:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-30 22:59 ` Olivier Galibert
2007-04-30 23:26   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-01 16:48   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  2:41   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  2:56     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02  5:27       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02 14:34         ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-02 17:57           ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-02 23:45             ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-02 23:54               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-04 21:06                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-05  0:22                   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-21 19:10                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-21 19:26                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-21 20:07                       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-21 20:22                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  0:31                           ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23  0:38                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  0:53                               ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23  0:56                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23  1:06                               ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 18:52                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 20:20                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 20:38                                     ` Alan Cox
2007-05-23 20:45                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 20:49                                     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 20:56                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 21:03                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:09                                           ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-05-23 21:35                                             ` Alan Cox
2007-05-23 21:35                                               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 21:37                                               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:42                                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-23 23:07                                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-23 21:54                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:06                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 22:16                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:28                                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 23:04                                                 ` David Miller
2007-05-23 23:11                                                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 23:15                                                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:21                                                       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 21:20                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 22:24                                           ` Olivier Galibert
2007-05-23 22:31                                             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-23 22:48                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 22:55                                               ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  0:21                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  2:59                                                   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  3:18                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  3:20                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-24  3:40                                                         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  5:19                                                           ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-24  6:18                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-24 15:42                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-23 23:04                                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:04                                   ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-23 23:06                                     ` Jesse Barnes
2007-05-24  0:02 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4654AD91.1030808@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox