From: Li Yu <raise.sail@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:49:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465B78AC.4050009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465A2DA4.7070409@gmail.com>
Li Yu wrote:
>
> But as I observe by cat /proc/sched_debug (2.6.21.1, UP, RHEL4), I
> found the all waiting fields often are more than zero, or less than zero.
>
> IMHO, the sum of task_struct->wait_runtime just is the denominator of
> all runnable time in some ways, is it right? if so, increasing the sum
> of wait_runtime just make scheduling decision more precise. so what's
> meaning for keeping the wait_runtime is zero-sum?
>
Forget it pls, here I am wrong, sorry for pestering.
Good luck
- Li Yu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 12:06 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14 Ingo Molnar
2007-05-23 19:39 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-05-23 19:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-23 20:02 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-05-24 6:42 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-24 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-24 9:19 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-24 17:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-24 20:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-24 22:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-25 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-25 16:45 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-28 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-29 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-05 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-29 10:19 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-26 14:58 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-05-26 15:08 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-06-01 13:35 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-06-01 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-07 22:29 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-06-01 15:37 ` [OT] " Andreas Mohr
2007-05-27 2:49 ` Li Yu
2007-05-29 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-29 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 9:45 ` Li Yu
2007-05-31 9:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-01 7:16 ` Li Yu
2007-06-01 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-05 2:33 ` Li Yu
2007-06-05 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-05 8:54 ` Li Yu
2007-06-06 7:41 ` Li Yu
2007-06-05 3:35 ` Li Yu
2007-05-28 1:17 ` Li Yu
2007-05-29 0:49 ` Li Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465B78AC.4050009@gmail.com \
--to=raise.sail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox