From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Block devices and barriers
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465C1DD1.8060201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18011.43887.825594.407340@notabene.brown>
Hello,
Neil Brown wrote:
>> but I can't find a way to actually trigger the calling of ps3disk_issue_flush()
>> and ps3disk_prepare_flush().
>>
>> 1. My prepare_flush_fn() routine should be called from queue_flush(), which is
>> in turn called by start_ordered().
>> start_ordered() is called by blk_do_ordered(), but only if there's no
>> barrier (REQ_HARDBARRIER is not set).
>> Apart from drivers/block/pktcdvd.c and init_request_from_bio()
>> (BIO_RW_BARRIER is set by drivers/md/md.c only?), the only other way
>> REQ_HARDBARRIER can be set is in queue_flush(), which is not possible.
>
> BIO_RW_BARRIER is set by various filesystems when mounted with
> -o barrier
> or
> -o barrier=1 (ext3)
>
> See calls to set_buffer_ordered in fs/jbd/commit.c
You driver first needs to call blk_queue_ordered() to set ordered mode
(probably QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN_FLUSH) and the filesystem needs to be
mounted with barrier enabled as Neil explained. Then, the FS will issue
barriers and the block layer will interpret them as draining + cache flush.
>> 2. My issue_flush_fn() should be called from blkdev_issue_flush() (ignoring
>> drivers/md). But blkdev_issue_flush() is called by ReiserFS and XFS only.
>
> Yeh, it isn't widely used at the moment.
I thought about re-implementing it in terms of barrier callbacks but
wasn't sure whether it would be better than completely removing
blkdev_issue_flush() && a bit lazy. :-)
I'll look into it.
>> I read the Block Device chapter in Linux Device Drivers 3rd edition, which says
>> to check blk_barrier_rq(), but the barrier part seems to be obsolete, as we now
>> have the prepare_flush_fn parameter of blk_queue_ordered().
>>
>> Am I missing something? Should I care about barriers?
>
> Yes, you should care about barriers, though it is true that there is
> some confusion around them and it might be difficult.
Yeap, basically a block driver needs two callbacks - issue_flush and
prepare_flush plus a call to blk_queue_ordered().
>> BTW, Documentation/block/barrier.txt seems to be out-of-date. Patch to update
>> it is below.
>
> You might like to post this directly to
> Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Received, acked && forwarded to Jens.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 13:16 Block devices and barriers Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-29 4:26 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-29 12:34 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465C1DD1.8060201@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox