From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:19:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465C608E.3040303@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705290945520.26602@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Mark Lord wrote:
> I just "upgraded" from 2.6.21.3 to 2.6.22-rc3,
> but will be rebooting back into 2.6.21.xx shortly.
>
> Suspend/Resume (RAM) works perfectly on this Dell i9400 dual-core notebook.
> Except with 2.6.22-rc3, all USB devices are non-functional on resume.
> Most of the time.
> Once in five reboots, my mouse worked after the first suspend/resume cycle,
> but not thereafter. 'lsusb' also hangs after resume.
>
> I'm attaching a full syslog with USB_DEBUG=y.
> I cannot use PM_DEBUG=y due to an unresolved race condition
> in the HRTIMER stuff (previously reported/discussed with no attempt at
> resolution).
>
> This notebook uses very mainstream Intel chips for most stuff:
..
> There are a zillion USB patches in 2.6.22-rc*.
> Greg: got any good suggestions on which one to revert first?
Okay, I used the "targeted revert" method instead of "git-bisect",
and nailed it in one try by reverting these two commits by Alan Stern:
7ed92f1a149dddc3cb537ccd7441e98adac12c3e USB: make the autosuspend workqueue thread freezable
ef7f6c7084b333c7524dcd297e0578d43733a2a2 USB: more autosuspend timer stuff
I yanked them both, as they appeared to be releated based on the titles.
Reverting this pair of commits fixes the USB suspend/resume regression.
Alan Stern: your ball now.
-ml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-29 16:35 Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset Mark Lord
2007-05-29 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-29 17:00 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 17:04 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 17:07 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-30 7:02 ` Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle onIntel chipset Romano Giannetti
2007-05-29 17:06 ` Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-29 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-29 19:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-29 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-29 17:19 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-05-29 17:37 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-29 18:19 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 18:28 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 18:41 ` Alan Stern
2007-05-29 19:11 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-29 20:34 ` [PATCH] USB: replace flush_workqueue with cancel_sync_work Alan Stern
2007-05-29 21:19 ` Mark Lord
2007-05-29 20:12 ` Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset Alan Stern
2007-05-29 17:03 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-05-29 17:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465C608E.3040303@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox