From: Roger Heflin <rheflin@atipa.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Apparent Deadlock with nfsd/jfs on 2.6.21.1 under bonnie.
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:14:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465C6D78.9030009@atipa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1180462215.10013.2.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com>
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup,
>> The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours,
>> so I am fairly sure the patch did correct the original lockup, or
>> at the very least make it a lot less likely.
>>
>> I hit the machine across NFS for 5 days before it deadlocked, before
>> the patch I could only get an hour or two (2-4 different tries).
>>
>> Given that pdflush is "D" it does not appear to be an NFS issue.
>>
>> Included is the sysrq-t.
>>
>> This is with 2.6.21.1 + the JFSIO patch.
>
> Is the system still in this state? Can you cat /proc/fs/jfs/TxAnchor
> (if CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is defined) and /proc/fs/jfs/txstats (if
> CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS is defined)?
>
> Thanks,
> Shaggy
Yes, the machine is still in that state.
Apparently I don't have either of those configured.
Anything else that we can collect before I rebuild the kernel with
those options setup?
Roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4649BED9.6090207@atipa.com>
[not found] ` <pan.2007.05.15.22.03.07.359081@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2007-05-15 22:06 ` Apparent Deadlock with nfsd/jfs on 2.6.21.1 under bonnie Roger Heflin
2007-05-17 14:37 ` Roger Heflin
2007-05-17 14:48 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-05-29 17:16 ` Roger Heflin
2007-05-29 18:10 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-05-29 18:14 ` Roger Heflin [this message]
2007-05-29 18:30 ` Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465C6D78.9030009@atipa.com \
--to=rheflin@atipa.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox