public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Case: 7454422: Re: Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH motherboards. (FULL DMESG)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:49:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <465EC464.7050302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465E513E.60903@shaw.ca>

Robert Hancock wrote:
> I think that mem=8832M would work as well, to make the kernel use only 
> the memory that is marked cacheable. (It looks like this parameter 
> takes the highest memory address we want the kernel to use, not the 
> highest memory amount.)
>
Yep, and that would be much easier too.

I am curious though as this seems to be somewhat common a problem, could 
we make the kernel analyze which memory is not cacheable (it already 
knows this via MTRR) and not use that portion for anything? Plus may be 
warn the user to contact their BIOS vendor to correct the problem?

I think that would be possible - even if the kernel knows late that the 
memory was uncached we could migrate those pages in that region to 
someplace else?

Parag

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-31 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-31  0:57 Case: 7454422: Re: Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH motherboards. (FULL DMESG) Parag Warudkar
2007-05-31  4:38 ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-31 12:33   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-05-31 12:49   ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2007-05-31 13:08     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-05-31 14:27       ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-31 18:44         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 16:33   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 17:57     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 18:10       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 20:56     ` Robert Hancock
     [not found] <fa.t8TZNHj4vrYcIs37jScT0oZl02s@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.nsJ3dX+uNBCD7bTYffkYm0DLnR4@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.lfTXDj3RBbaCLDUJJFzLVowMlxc@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.lrZMTvBB9xwYW1mcA0nyYFjB9qY@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.AIUKY82rbgpQ/AiIxhRL0fahxaQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.yz+v/A2zkJKIswF0Y4Mo4FxwnCI@ifi.uio.no>
2007-05-30 23:29           ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-31  4:56             ` Yinghai Lu
     [not found] <fa.4kEpre7NAj1mG6fooUMp/WVc8tg@ifi.uio.no>
2007-05-30  4:08 ` Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH motherboards Robert Hancock
2007-05-30  8:43   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-05-30 14:27     ` Robert Hancock
2007-05-30 14:33       ` Case: 7454422: Re: Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH motherboards. (FULL DMESG) Justin Piszcz
2007-05-30 14:36         ` Justin Piszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=465EC464.7050302@gmail.com \
    --to=parag.warudkar@gmail.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox