From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759176AbXEaQ41 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753976AbXEaQ4U (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:20 -0400 Received: from relay00.pair.com ([209.68.5.9]:2029 "HELO relay00.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753410AbXEaQ4T (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:19 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.241.238.207 Message-ID: <465EFE31.30904@cybsft.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:56:17 -0500 From: "K.R. Foley" Organization: Cybersoft Solutions, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed? References: <465EE33B.4070502@cybsft.com> <20070531153821.GA712@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070531153821.GA712@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * K.R. Foley wrote: > >> Ingo, >> >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. > > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3. > > Ingo > So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit differently than previous versions. Sorry. -- kr