Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

["K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
> 
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ingo,
>>>>
>>>> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 
>>>> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
>>> yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
>>>
>>> 	Ingo
>>>
>> So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit 
>> differently than previous versions. Sorry.
> 
> yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3 
> - but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have 
> a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

Well don't change any of this on my account. Whatever is easiest for
everyone else is fine with me. I was merely pointing it out to possibly
help someone else out rather than as a complaint.

-- 
   kr