From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762501AbXFARSE (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:18:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761059AbXFARRz (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:17:55 -0400 Received: from sandeen.net ([209.173.210.139]:12244 "EHLO sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760990AbXFARRz (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:17:55 -0400 Message-ID: <466054C1.3040100@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:53 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Cyrill Gorcunov , LKML , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF References: <20070524165935.GB19709@duck.suse.cz> <20070524170554.GC19709@duck.suse.cz> <20070524203653.GA7693@duck.suse.cz> <465DF0B4.2050203@sandeen.net> <465DF91F.3010201@sandeen.net> <20070531174201.GB8392@cvg> <465F09E7.7000300@sandeen.net> <20070601164926.GA8398@cvg> <20070601100425.89537dda.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070601100425.89537dda.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Recursive lock_kernel() is OK. Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a good thing.... :) Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate further. -Eric