From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: Remove conditions with no effects
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:49:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4661119.G1Uu3eHz2z@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c87140c6e580b443de5d4abafb7872c8ee3efef.camel@perches.com>
On Sunday, June 6, 2021 7:56:32 AM CEST Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 06:35 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Removed conditions with no effects. Detected by Coccinelle.
>
> It's be good if you researched how this came to be and noted it
> in the changelog.
>
> try:
>
> commit dc365d2cc579200bc3752ddb941e046e3a16962c
> Author: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Mar 16 15:04:11 2021 +0100
>
> staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused code blocks conditioned by never set
> CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN
>
I've just read the commit you pointed out. It seems that the conditions with
no effects came out while removing code that was conditionally compiled by the
unused definition CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN.
However, I don't understand why those "conditions with no effects" have been
left there.
Now I'm not sure of what you asked me to do: should I leave them there as they
are (perhaps because I missed something) or should I explain in my patch that
they were overlooked by commit dc365d2cc579?
Thanks in advance,
Fabio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-06 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-06 4:35 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: Remove conditions with no effects Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-06-06 5:56 ` Joe Perches
2021-06-06 6:49 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4661119.G1Uu3eHz2z@linux.local \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox