Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)

[Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>]

On 06/05/2007 04:40 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

> Rene Herman wrote:

>> No, what we have is a sizeof(pointer) sized pointer pointing to an
>> object of size zero. ZERO_SIZE_PTR is butt-ugly. With a really ugly butt. 
> 
> It doesn't matter.  It will never, ever, be used by anything except the
> kmalloc internals.  No client code should ever use the constant for
> anything.

Yes, I'm aware of this (I should snip less) but I still feel it's not a good 
name. When I read say "a 64-bit pointer" I immediately take that to mean a 
pointer of size 64-bit, not a pointer to 64-bits and only it not making any 
sense would stop me from interpreting "ZERO_SIZE_PTR" similarly.

Yes, it's internal but given that this is open-source which, optimistically, is 
read many more times than it's written one should still strive for code that 
reads nice as far as I'm concerned. It's obviously also not hugely important but 
it's just that ZERO_SIZE_PTR makes my neck hair stand up.

Rene.