From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
jbaron@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:17:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606230641.GA11592@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> The output has changed from a terribly wide table to an enormously
>> long list (just the generic way the statistics code prints data).
>
> Sigh, why dont you _ask_ before doing such stuff?
A nice diffstat is always worth a try, isn't it?
And I see other reasons for code sharing.
Ah, and doing it has been actually quite simple once I had figured out
what the original code does. :-)
> It is a terribly wide table because that makes it easily greppable
If one looks for contentions of "xtime_lock" within my enormously long list,
they could issue:
grep -e "xtime_lock contentions" data
and get
xtime_lock contentions 0x17bd2 3327 account_ticks+0x96/0x184
xtime_lock contentions other 0
for example.
So how is this worse?
> but still watchable in one chunk in a sufficiently zoomed out xterm.
I am wondering whether we really want to reject kernel patches on the basis of
this reasoning, disregarding any other point why a patch might be helpful.
> Please preserve this output format
I understand why everybody likes their format most. It's always made to measure.
Chosing a different - or common - format didn't happen in bad faith.
Made to measure file format doesn't work well once we start abstracting out this
functionality. And I feel that was expected too much of a low level kernel ABI
piece.
I would like to add that usuability doesn't necessarily suffer if statistics for
some brand new gadget look somewhat familiar and similar to other statistics one
has encountered earlier.
>, quite some work went into it - NACK :-(
Considering the amount of code.. ;-) I am sorry.
But seriously, did you consider using some user space tool or script to
format this stuff the way you like it - similar to the way the powertop tool
reshuffles timer_stats data found in a proc file, for example?
The format of an enormously long list has been thought out keeping this
particular requirement in mind.
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 21:34 [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:17 ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-06-07 4:40 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-07 7:03 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 8:56 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-11 11:26 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 16:27 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 6:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 6:59 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08 16:07 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:21 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:00 ` Martin Peschke
[not found] ` <1181322460.5728.2.camel@lappy>
[not found] ` <46698F7F.4090407@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-08 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:37 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-11 10:31 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:13 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 12:20 ` Martin Peschke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com \
--to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox