public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	jbaron@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:17:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606230641.GA11592@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> The output has changed from a terribly wide table to an enormously 
>> long list (just the generic way the statistics code prints data). 
> 
> Sigh, why dont you _ask_ before doing such stuff?

A nice diffstat is always worth a try, isn't it?
And I see other reasons for code sharing.
Ah, and doing it has been actually quite simple once I had figured out
what the original code does. :-)

> It is a terribly wide table because that makes it easily greppable

If one looks for contentions of "xtime_lock" within my enormously long list,
they could issue:

    grep -e "xtime_lock contentions" data

and get

    xtime_lock contentions 0x17bd2 3327 account_ticks+0x96/0x184
    xtime_lock contentions other 0

for example.

So how is this worse?

> but still watchable in one chunk in a sufficiently zoomed out xterm.

I am wondering whether we really want to reject kernel patches on the basis of 
this reasoning, disregarding any other point why a patch might be helpful.

 > Please preserve this output format

I understand why everybody likes their format most. It's always made to measure.
Chosing a different - or common - format didn't happen in bad faith.

Made to measure file format doesn't work well once we start abstracting out this 
functionality. And I feel that was expected too much of a low level kernel ABI 
piece.

I would like to add that usuability doesn't necessarily suffer if statistics for 
some brand new gadget look somewhat familiar and similar to other statistics one 
  has encountered earlier.

>, quite some work went into it - NACK :-(

Considering the amount of code.. ;-)    I am sorry.

But seriously, did you consider using some user space tool or script to
format this stuff the way you like it - similar to the way the powertop tool
reshuffles timer_stats data found in a proc file, for example?

The format of an enormously long list has been thought out keeping this 
particular requirement in mind.


	Martin


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-07  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-06 21:34 [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  0:17   ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-06-07  4:40     ` Bill Huey
2007-06-07  7:03       ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:30         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  8:56           ` Bill Huey
2007-06-11 11:26             ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 16:27           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  6:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07  6:59       ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08 16:07           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  0:21   ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:00   ` Martin Peschke
     [not found]     ` <1181322460.5728.2.camel@lappy>
     [not found]       ` <46698F7F.4090407@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-08 17:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:37           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 17:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-11 10:31               ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:13   ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 10:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 12:20   ` Martin Peschke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com \
    --to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox