Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1

WANG Cong
2007-06-07T15:39:23Z

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:04:44AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:51:58PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> >> Maybe there's something wrong with ketchup. ;(
>> >
>> >Can you do an 'lsdiff | grep lguest' on the patch in your ~/.ketchup directory?
>> >
>> >Ketchup simply applies patches, it never touches filenames directly.
>> >So for something to go wrong here and drop a file in the tree with a
>> >damaged pathname, you've either got a damaged patch, a bug in patch
>> >itself, or some form of filesystem corruption.
>>
>> Thanks for your point.
>>
>> It should be Documentation/lguest/lguest.c, maybe it was corrupted and ketchup
>> backuped it as mlguest.c.
>
>It'd be interesting to figure out how that happened, still.
>
>If your patch file is intact (are you using GPG's signature-checking
>support?), the most likely explanation is an operating system or
>filesystem bug.

Yes, I am using GPG's checking.

I think the most possible reason is that source file might be corrupted.
It's hardly the filesystem's fault, since I am using a stable kernel.

>
>Can you reproduce it?

May be very hard.;(

I deleted all the files of that version and download a new version to use.

Thanks!