From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, billh@gnuppy.monkey.org, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:13:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46698E50.6030108@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1181202683.7348.220.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 23:34 +0200, Martin Peschke wrote:
>
>> +struct statistic_info lock_stat_info[_LOCK_STAT_NUMBER] = {
>> + [LOCK_STAT_CONT] = {
>> + .name = "contentions",
>> + .x_unit = "instruction_pointer",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=sparse entries=4",
>> + .flags = STATISTIC_FLAGS_LABEL,
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_WAIT_READ] = {
>> + .name = "wait_read",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_WAIT_WRITE] = {
>> + .name = "wait_write",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_HOLD_READ] = {
>> + .name = "hold_read",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_HOLD_WRITE] = {
>> + .name = "hold_write",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> }
>> };
>
> You're parsing strings in-kernel to setup data structures?
Might be surprising (or revolting?)... but, yes, I do.
.defaults reflects the developers opinion on the way of data
accumululation that might make most sense in most cases.
The current implementation of lib/statistic.c allows users to change
setting that we see in .defaults. If one needs to track more than
4 contention points, for example, then they can change this limit by
passing "entries=4" to the user interface. So there is some parsing
code anyway. Passing default setting in a similar fashion has just been
convenient for the developer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-08 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 21:34 [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:17 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 4:40 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-07 7:03 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 8:56 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-11 11:26 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 16:27 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 6:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 6:59 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08 16:07 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:21 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:00 ` Martin Peschke
[not found] ` <1181322460.5728.2.camel@lappy>
[not found] ` <46698F7F.4090407@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-08 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:37 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-11 10:31 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:13 ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-06-07 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 12:20 ` Martin Peschke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46698E50.6030108@de.ibm.com \
--to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox