From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763474AbXFJWLR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:11:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755711AbXFJWLI (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:11:08 -0400 Received: from cb2.northrockquote.com ([64.251.14.146]:1548 "EHLO dejavu.debianpt.org" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758581AbXFJWLH (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: <466C76B9.7010404@debianpt.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:10:01 +0100 From: Miguel Figueiredo Organization: DebianPT.org User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Celso CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 - Re: -ck patch | Feedback References: <1181341039.28846.0.camel@localhost> <466A7321.4060304@debianpt.org> <1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Celso wrote: > Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu: >> Celso wrote: >>> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the >>> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the >>> system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck. >>> Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that >>> needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam. >>> >>> Thanks a lot for the patches. >>> >>> PS: when will this go into the official kernel? >>> >> Hi there, >> >> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ? >> >> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i >> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less >> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of >> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader, >> consoles, ...). >> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel. >> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i >> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive. >> >> >> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice >> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage. >> >> >> >> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21, >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2 >> >> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has >> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements! >> > > Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before > 2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No > problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much > difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but > in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more > "fluid"*. > > * direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well > I don't know if there is an official announcement of patch releases but today i spotted and started to use the new 2.6.22-rc4-ck1. The list of patches included on 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 it's on http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-ck1/patches/ It's working... -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org