From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753604AbXFNQB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:01:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752252AbXFNQBT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:01:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34566 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbXFNQBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:01:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4671664A.8010404@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:01:14 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-stable CC: linux-kernel , Dave Jones Subject: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable? Gentoo developers did a full backport: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=118047865916766&w=2