From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758745AbXFOVUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:20:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755562AbXFOVUK (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:20:10 -0400 Received: from cb2.northrockquote.com ([64.251.14.146]:2641 "EHLO dejavu.debianpt.org" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756212AbXFOVUI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:20:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4673026F.8070406@debianpt.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:19:43 +0100 From: Miguel Figueiredo Organization: DebianPT.org User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Steigerwald CC: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) References: <466DE921.9030709@debianpt.org> (sfid-20070612_171838_254605_20164719) <200706121852.58161.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <200706121852.58161.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Miguel Figueiredo: >> Hi all, >> >> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found on >> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c > > Hi Miquel, Ingo, Con! > [...] > Any suggestions? I read somewhere in the list that X itself makes lots of hocus pocus that affect the behavior of programs running inside X itself (i even read about X's own scheduling - someone can confirm/deny it? - and evil behavior on drivers). If we look/test a fair/responsive scheduler isn't better to test it outside X? IMHO, X itself, it's too complex and may obscure our tests on fairness/interactivity. Anyone knows any good tests for interctivity? [...] -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org