From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764333AbXFRQA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:00:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757472AbXFRQAu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:00:50 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:47551 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762504AbXFRQAt (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:00:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4676AC2D.1050107@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:00:45 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: implementation of boot-time kernel parameters References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i'm also aware of an older and (apparently) LILO-specific way to do > it -- using something like "pas16=" where the appropriate driver code > has to parse the value string (eg., in drivers/scsi/pas16.c): > Utter nonsense. The only reason these older drivers mention "LILO" is because some of these driver authors thought LILO was the only native Linux bootloader. -hpa